Which statement is true about commitment in the presence of poor alternatives?

Which statement is true about commitment in the presence of poor alternatives?

• A. Individuals may stay even if dissatisfied because alternatives are perceived as poor.
• B. Investments have no effect.
• C. Alternatives do not influence commitment.
• D. Only satisfaction matters.

Answer: (A)

Commitment grows when the options outside the current situation look unattractive, so you stay even if you’re not fully satisfied. The choice to stay isn’t only about how good things are here; it also depends on what you believe you could get elsewhere. If other options seem poor, the incentive to leave weakens, making staying the more reasonable path despite dissatisfaction. Past investments can also raise the cost of leaving, reinforcing the decision to stay. That’s why the statement that people may remain because alternatives are perceived as poor best captures how commitment operates in this context.

Commitment grows when the options outside the current situation look unattractive, so you stay even if you’re not fully satisfied. The choice to stay isn’t only about how good things are here; it also depends on what you believe you could get elsewhere. If other options seem poor, the incentive to leave weakens, making staying the more reasonable path despite dissatisfaction. Past investments can also raise the cost of leaving, reinforcing the decision to stay. That’s why the statement that people may remain because alternatives are perceived as poor best captures how commitment operates in this context.